WASHINGTON — Cratered support among the Republican base, new priorities in the banking industry and simple pragmatism have significantly weakened the relationship between banks and the GOP, and opened up room for modest but increasing partnerships with Congressional Democrats, in a role reversal that would have been unthinkable just a decade ago.
According to a study late last year by Pew Research, while likely Democratic voters’ views on banks and big corporations have remained relatively stable, Republican attitudes toward banks have rapidly soured over the past four years.
“About four-in-ten Republicans and Republican-leaning independents (38%) and Democrats and Democratic leaners (41%) now say banks and other financial institutions have a positive effect on the way things are going in the country” Pew Research wrote in a piece on the study.
This represents a steep decline, since as recently as 2019, 63% of Republican voters thought banks had a positive effect on the country, as opposed to 37% of Democrats. Experts say that while banks have long faced bipartisan criticism, the GOP’s culture war has worsened banks’ already-dwindling favor among the GOP base, and fractured the party’s historically finance-friendly reputation.
In the midst of this decoupling, and with the GOP engaged in an unpredictable culture war, Democrats and banks appear to be increasingly siding with the devil they know, at least in certain areas where their policy priorities align.
Ian Katz, managing director at Capital Alpha Partners, agrees that populist sentiment in the Republican Party has been growing for some time now. In the era of increasing politicization of social and cultural issues, Republicans see anti-wokeness as a political strategy that resonates with their base.
“Republicans in Congress have become less like the pro-business, free-trade Republicans of a decade or more ago,” Katz said. “They are more populist now. They were moving in that direction, but Trump accelerated it. So now Republicans in Congress aren’t the reliable defenders of banks that they used to be. I think in the past year or two the trend has accelerated even more because of Republican suspicions that banks are adopting the Democrats’ views on issues such as ESG and inclusion.”
Democrats and big banks have been some of the loudest critics of cryptocurrency, borne of a mutual distrust of unregulated market actors and fears of consumer exploitation. Democrats and banks have also found themselves aligned in their skepticism of fintechs and alternative banking charters — such as Industrial Loan Companies.
Those concerns have been strengthened in the wake of crypto scandals like the precipitous decline of crypto exchange FTX and recent indictment of the owner of Hong Kong-based Bitzlato on money laundering charges. Both banks and Democrats have expressed unified support — albeit with disparate motives — for proposals like Senate Banking Committee Chair Sherrod Brown’s Close the Shadow Banking Loophole Act, which was introduced late in the 117th Congress. Though both are concerned with the risks of dark finance like consumer abuses and fraud, banks have an interest in making sure non-bank charters don’t get all the benefits of banking without playing by the same set of rules.
By contrast, many GOP lawmakers worry more about the dangers of regulatory overreach than the dangers of under-regulated financial firms. Biden-appointed bank regulators and Republicans have repeatedly clashed over the issue, and it will continue to feature prominently given that House Financial Services Committee chair Patrick McHenry, R-N.C. created a new subcommittee specifically to address digital assets.
The increasing trend for banks to employ values-based investment practices, which consider an environmental, social and corporate governance framework known as ESG, has also caused friction with Republicans. The GOP has lashed out at ESG efforts, along with bank diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives as part of what thea “woke” agenda, and Republican State officials have gone so far as to retaliate against banks who pursue climate-conscious ESG policies.
Republican staff of the Senate Banking Committee released a report recently floating the idea of punishing the big three accounting firms that adopt ESG or DEI measures by classifying them as bank holding companies because of the way their political stances influence banks, threatening to punish any semblance of liberal capitulation with onerous regulatory burdens.
Consumer advocates like Carter Dougherty of Americans for Financial Reform think the wedge between the GOP and banks has been growing for some time, suggesting ESG outrage is merely a symptom of broader disenchantment that Americans feel toward financial services writ large.
“The change here is that there is more bipartisan criticism of Wall Street in Congress.” Carter said in an email. “For over a decade, the country as a whole, across both parties, has been bank-critical, and supportive of efforts by Congress to be tough on Wall Street. The 2008 crisis and the Great Recession left deep scars on this country.”
But other observers think growing Republican hostility may drive banks towards working increasingly with the left. Former FDIC lawyer and independent consultant Todd Phillips believes that banks have a real interest in currying favor with an increasingly liberal public, and that the profit incentive behind being perceived as socially conscious outweighs any threats the right can lob at them.
“I think it’s almost a perfect storm that is helping the banks gain ground with Democrats,” Phillips said. “Banks are really just trying to do what they think is in their own economic interest. It’s just really strange that we have the party of free markets that is trying to tell banks what to do, and I think that’s fracturing the bond between banks and Republicans that’s been building for about a decade now.”